Talk:Gleichschaltung
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gleichschaltung article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 14, 2006, July 14, 2007, March 6, 2022, and March 6, 2023. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Older talk
[edit]I have created three legislation pages for Reichstag Fire Decree, Enabling Act, and Law Regarding Measures of State Self-Defense, which in part reproduce the legislation. I have done the translation to English myself; if you find any bad wording there, please do correct, my Legal English is imperfect. -- djmutex 2003-04-30
"Enabling act" is a common legal phrase. Your current article will have to be renamed and "Enabling Act" turned into a disambiguation page...something like "Enabling Act (Reichstag)". —B 19:19, Oct 23, 2003 (UTC)
use of the word in american politics
[edit]I removed this part entirely:
"Revival of the Word in American Politics
In the last fifth of the twentieth century, both the left and the right in the U.S.A. use this word, although it is quite uncommon, to describe each others' tactics in the so-called "culture wars". The classic example of its use is that all members of the American Legal Association succumbed to a proclamation that the ALA as a whole believed in the laws concerning abortion in the U.S. What could conservatives do to say that they had opinions of their own, when confronted with this diktat?
Similarly, the left uses it to decry the attempts of "stealth candidates" on the right to undo certain "progressive" issues which the left had gotten made law, habit, or accepted practice by means that the right considers unfair. But both the left and the right use any of various means other than outright plebiscite or grassroots program to make or attempt to unmake any such laws.
The word is not used for attempts of the right to silence the press, spy on the public, or overthrow regulatory agencies. Those actions are too blatant to require the revival of an obscure term that most Americans have never seen and which is difficult for them to pronounce."
Especially the last paragraph is wrong, biased and completely uncalled for. I'm not sure about the other parts but I don't know enough about the use of the word in american politics to separate fact and opinion.saturnight 16:50, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)